Hello Anthony, 2009/8/27 Anthony Minessale <[email protected]>:
> 600k is not a leak? FS can use as much as a gig of ram or more depending on > what you are doing. it's 600*1024 * 4* 1024 /1024/1024 => ~ 2.4 Gig that's what i tried to express with the "physical pages" in my first post. > you may want to install a fresh copy of FS, removing all your old files etc > and make sure they build clean. i "make current" to get the SOFIA-22 bugfix. > We also have not had much luck running on ubuntu which is more of a desktop > centric OS. really? even the "server" edition? (not the netbook remix :) Is 64bit so grave different if i don't need to address more than 4 Gig of ram per process? > I recommend you try your application on 64 bit CentOS which is the platform > all of our paid customers use. hmm. our operations-people wont be happy with that. But as i carefully followed the other mailing-list-threads it came to my mind that i could be the culprit: somehow the original example.xml came back into the directory tree and included a lot of things, most notably the hash-inserts for last-dailed-numbers and stuff. I stripped it down to what it was before and gave it another try. thx again and (hopefully) sorry Beni. _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
