So, the first way would be to have a look on the sip stack, which is,
in fact, sofia ..., well, sound's like a nice, fun, long-going hobby
project to me :-)
I will definitly at least look at the sip code to check if it is
something i would myself willingly give over to ...
But I *really* do want a setup where it does not matter if one
specific FS instance is UP or NOT ...
--
Raimund Sacherer
-
RunSolutions
Open Source It Consulting
-
Parc Bit - Centro Empresarial Son Espanyol
Edificio Estel - Local 3D
07121 - Palma de Mallorca
Baleares
On Aug 29, 2009, at 10:04 PM, Brian West wrote:
The sip stack needs to be modified to spin that data up into the
state machine so that it can take over calls once the fail over
takes place... its not an easy task.
/b
On Aug 29, 2009, at 2:56 PM, Mitul Limbani wrote:
Is itnpossible to have a db cluster know the state of each and
every call and then use Heartbeat on this db +
fs cluster so that clients see only one ip where as internally all
fs boxes refer db for call states, db again is under replication.
This in the thioery can be written, but I am sure if we think bit
more on this direction the problem seem to be getting addressed.
Other guys also chip in their 2 cents, we just need 50 of em to
make a full dollar.
Thanks & Regards,
Mitul Limbani,
Founder & CEO,
Enterux Solutions Pvt. Ltd.,
The Enterprise Linux Company (r),
http://www.enterux.com
http://www.entVoice.com
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-
users
http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
