On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 08:38:41AM -0600, Mark Sobkow wrote:
> I still need to stuff the Freeswitch PID into global storage somewhere
> so the process that's handling the configuration requests can send the
> reply without crashing (it's just getting a node id, not a Pid), but I
> seem to be on my way to configuring Freeswitch via ERLang.
>
Looking at your code, assuming I read it right, you should be able to
just replace:
FreeSWITCHNode ! SomeMsg.
with
{api, FreeSWITCHNode} ! SomeMsg.
The freeswitch module doesn't really have a pid, since it's not a real
erlang node, it's all faked and all messages to a pid or a registered
process on the C node go to the same place.
Andrew
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
