SILK will NEVER take off if they don't stop jerking developers around. I have a silk binary but its 32bit only... You CAN NOT link a 32bit .a file into a 64bit .so just won't work. And I emailed about this fact and I got brushed off .. it takes only a few seconds to compile a 64bit version yet they seem to not be interested.
CELT will win this battle. Its Open it works NOW. /b On Sep 28, 2009, at 7:25 PM, Jason White wrote: > I just read a blog post about this. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vos-silk-00 > > My main questions about it would be > > 1. whether it will be licenced in such a way as to permit free > software/open-source implementation in FreeSWITCH. I suppose this > partly > depends on IETF's patent policy. > > 2. How it compares with Celt, which doesn't give rise to any known > patent > issues and is available for FreeSWITCH today. > > for other FreeSWITCH users who wish to experiment with Celt and > listen to > high-quality wide-band calls, it should be noted that Celt is still > under > development and backward-incompatible changes have occurred in the > past. > Making sure that both endpoints are using the same version of Celt > solves > this, otherwise the audible results can be rather unpleasant. > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch- > users > http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
