On 2009-10-08 19:53 +0300, Vlasis Hatzistavrou (KTI) wrote freeswitch-users...:

VHK>Georgiewskiy Yuriy wrote:
VHK>> On 2009-10-08 10:43 -0500, Anthony Minessale wrote 
[email protected]...:
VHK>> 
VHK>> AM>If you are going to make that alternate module are you going to host 
it in
VHK>> AM>the FS tree along side mod_opal?
VHK>> 
VHK>> Yes, but then it be useful, now i have working only signaling part and 
some 
VHK>> kinde of not working rtp part :)
VHK>
VHK>
VHK>Hello Yuriy,
VHK>
VHK>Since FS already has its own RTP stack (for pass-through and 
VHK>transcoding) wouldn't it be best if your H323 implementation with OPAL 
VHK>was used for signaling only and rely on FS RTP for the media? Perhaps 
VHK>that would save you time and effort, too?

it already use fs rtp stack, and my implementation based on h323plus, not on 
opal, 
but fs rtp stack not so complete, there need write some code to send/receive 
packets 
because fs stac only encode/decode packets, not send/receive, or i don't known 
how to 
do it with it. i don't find any example for this.


C уважением                       With Best Regards
Георгиевский Юрий.                Georgiewskiy Yuriy
+7 4872 711666                    +7 4872 711666
факс +7 4872 711143               fax +7 4872 711143
Компания ООО "Ай Ти Сервис"       IT Service Ltd
http://nkoort.ru                  http://nkoort.ru
JID: [email protected] JID: [email protected]
YG129-RIPE                        YG129-RIPE
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Reply via email to