src/switch_ivr_bridge.c This could just as well be a glare condition when the call is in process of tearing down.
Mike On Dec 8, 2009, at 6:48 PM, Nik Middleton wrote: > No doubt, but that’s a little difficult as this only happens occasionally and > I have 200 calls going on at the time. It’s needle in the haystack stuff. > > Here’s what I know. > > I have an external process listening for DTMF events. If I detect ‘*’ I do a > kill uuid on the B leg. On a number of occasions I get an error saying the B > leg doesn’t exist, so I now do a double kill on the associated leg which I > get from the event. I do not get a ‘doesn’t exist’ message for the A leg, > which leads me to believe that process of tearing down both bridged legs is > flawed. > > The kluge clears the B leg hang issue, so the pressure’s off for me, but when > I get a few nano seconds, I’ll look at the code to see if there’s anything > obvious. > > Can anyone give me a hint on what module handles bridged calls? (sorry, being > lazy and suffering from a lack of sleep) > > Regards, > > From: freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org > [mailto:freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Michael > Jerris > Sent: 08 December 2009 16:16 > To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] no hangup on B leg > > We will really need debug logs and sip traces to be able to figure out what > exactly is going on here. > > Mike > > On Dec 7, 2009, at 4:06 PM, Nik Middleton wrote: > > > Sorry no, apart from the fact that I was seeing the hangup. > > > I’m wondering if this a bandwidth congestion issue. Is there anyway on a > bridged call I could trap on dtmf like look for ‘*’ and force a hangup? I > don’t seem to able to see this tone on the B leg though. > > Regards, > From: freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org > [mailto:freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Michael > Collins > Sent: 07 December 2009 19:12 > To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] no hangup on B leg > > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Nik Middleton > <nik.middle...@noblesolutions.co.uk> wrote: > Hi all, > > I’ll slowly pulling my hair out on this one. I had FS successfully hanging > up both legs on a bridge, now today, with nothing changed, I’m not seeing a > hangup of the b leg at all. > > FS is behind a PIX, so it might be a weird NAT issue, but A leg calls hangup > just fine. Before when I had an issue with the B leg not closing the bridge, > I was at least getting a hangup event, now it’s not being fired. Does anyone > have an idea what might be causing this? > > Regards, > > Time for SIP traces and debug logs. Also, do you have any logs from when > things seemed to be working so that you can compare? > -MC > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
