We switched to Windows for production after 1.0.4. We've run into no stability issues with it. The highest we go is only 100 sessions/sec. We're also use media bypass and mod_managed.
-Michael -----Original Message----- From: freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Fred-145 Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 12:39 AM To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Subject: [Freeswitch-users] [Windows] Stable enough for production use? Hello Since Freeswitch is also available for Windows (and Mac, but I don't anything about Macintosh), I'd like some feedback from users who routinely run Freeswitch on that OS. Is it stable enough to be used in production to handle a single analog line (ie. SOHO use), or should I warn customers that they really should buy a dedicated Linux box to run FS? Thank you. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/-Windows--Stable-enough-for-production-use--tp26807322p26807322.html Sent from the Freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
