Hi Ross,
On 02-11-11 22:10, Ross Whenmouth wrote:
>> Subject:
>> Re: [Freetel-codec2] FEC
>> From:
>> Andreas Weller <wel...@andreas-weller.de>
>>
>> In the actual stage of codec2's development the whole FEC/Modem
>> discussion is far too early. In my opinion codec2 should be fully
>> developed and investigated until it can compete with other commercial
>> voice codecs or even outperform them. This is evolution - it has nothing
>> to do with "hindering progress": apparently the opposite is true -
>> biologically speaking, we will observe surviving of the fittest
> Yes, I agree. Lets finish Codec2 first, then determine the effect that
> bit errors in the different parts of a frame have on speech quality,
> then design the various transport layers (FEC/sync/modems etc) for the
> each application?
The way I see it, one thing does not exclude the other.
The kind of work that David, Bruce, Peter, Jean-Marc and others are
doing, are way out the league of most people.
But that does not mean that some other people might be interested to
start to experiment with it and look at some other aspects of it:
modems, FEC-algorithms, programming APIs, ...
But I agree that, by definition, we should all concider codec2 as "still
alpha code".
Nothing more, nothing less.
73
Kristoff - ON1ARF
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
