To compare this to text, this is the equivalent of 200 5-bit teletype characters per second or 125 8-bit ASCII characters. So, we're around 5 to 8 times the rate we might achieve with "text robophone" - speech-to-text to text-to-speech, and maybe 3 to 5 times the rate we might achieve with "phoneme robophone" - the same but using phoneme data.
Perhaps we could use a codebook approach to further compress the robophone data. But it hardly seems worthwhile, because we're already close to robophone rates with a real codec.
Thanks Bruce
<<attachment: bruce.vcf>>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
_______________________________________________ Freetel-codec2 mailing list Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2