[Gah, keep forgetting to switch the From: address]
Hi,
On 13/04/13 08:44, Kristoff Bonne wrote:
> On 12-04-13 20:04, Bruce Perens wrote:
>>> >> The low-pass filter should be passing everything below about 22.05 or 
>>> >> 24 kHz, right? Even an imperfect filter should be fine. 
>> > Oh. Kristoff, is the modem not using Manchester encoding?
> No, I might be wrong but I guess this would double the required baudrate.
> 
> The 4800  bps modem is simply 4800 baud at 1 bit/symbol. For Manchester 
> encoding, you would needs 2 bits per symbol.

This might be an absurd suggestion, I don't know... but would the
1600bps Codec2 scheme work?

This has the side-effect of being directly compatible with HF FreeDV;
the bit-stream merely needs re-modulation and framing as the actual
audio data is the same, making HF-to-VHF/UHF gateways trivial.

Manchester encoding would mean an effective rate of 2400; which would
still allow for 800 bits of headroom for things like synchronisation and
ID headers, etc.
-- 
Stuart Longland (aka Redhatter, VK4MSL)

I haven't lost my mind...
  ...it's backed up on a tape somewhere.

-- 
Stuart Longland (aka Redhatter, VK4MSL)

I haven't lost my mind...
  ...it's backed up on a tape somewhere.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced
analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building
apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use
our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free account!
http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter
_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2

Reply via email to