On Mon, 22 Apr 2013, Bruce Perens wrote:

> So, David removed the VQ. He then 
> applied 16 bits of FEC to the most significant bits only. So, bit errors 
> result in a signal that might be somewhat off but is still readable by ear.
>
> We end up with a fade margin comparable to SSB, where previously it took an 
> S7 signal to work reliably (and everyone complained).

That's crazy cool!

Is there a chance that sometime down the road it can be made better than SSB as 
well?  Perhaps 2 or 3 years out?

I'm amazed at the progress so far, and it can only get better!


> We can only do this because we have access to the codec internals. As far as 
> I'm aware, AMBE uses a data FEC scheme and several times more bandwidth, and 
> would not approach the robustness that we could provide using a GMSK system, 
> not to mention our FDM modem.

I assume AMBE cost a great deal more to develop too.  ;-)

-- 
Curt, WE7U.        http://wetnet.net/~we7u
APRS in Search and Rescue:  http://wetnet.net/~we7u/search_and_rescue.html

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced
analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building
apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use
our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free account!
http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter
_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2

Reply via email to