Doh! OK I hereby delegate setting version numbers to u Richard :-) On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 21:53 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > Oops! I hope I wasn't missunderstood. The 0.96 was fine, it was > jumping to 0.961 that was the problem... No need to separate the 9 and > 6. I'm not sure what we'd call the last digit anyway, you already have > major:0, minor:96 and presumably patch:1 to be incremented to 2 (if > it's considered a patch revision, or maybe 0.97 if it's "minor". > > > Richard > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt > New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service > that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your > browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic > and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may > _______________________________________________ Freetel-codec2 mailing list > Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may _______________________________________________ Freetel-codec2 mailing list Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
