Hi Richard, I'd like to see the codec2-dev autotools and FreeDV src/Makefile.linux stay for a little longer pls.
Could some other people on the list pls try to build FreeDV with cmake and report back? Thnaks, David On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 11:27 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > Unless someone has a problem/data point to the contrary, I think the > cmake build now performs equal or better than the autotools build for > all systems/platforms. > > > Is it time for the patchwork of makefiles to die? I think it's causing > confusing to newer people attempting to build codec2/freedv for the > first time. > > > Thoughts? > > > Thanks, > Richard > KF5OIM > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ Freetel-codec2 mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Freetel-codec2 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
