On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Matthew <[email protected]> wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> Fine; I've installed it on my CentOS box, but that doesn't mean I like it.
> It still doesn't make sense to take away options, even if they aren't being
> maintained like someone would want.
>
Perhaps there's been some conversation I haven't been privy to, but what
does the cmake build have to do with CentOS? The whole point of the cmake
build is it should work for almost any system (linux/windows/OSX/BSD)
I'm often overly diplomatic most of the time which hasn't seemed to help so
I'll be more direct...
I don't see how changing to cmake effectively "takes options away", other
than in the very technical interpretation that yes, the autotools build
will eventually go away. The cmake build lets you have more control over
the build, how it get's built, and even how it gets installed. How does
that provide less options?
You want it to do something that it doesn't do yet? Ask! If I can figure
out how to make it happen I'll do it.
You've made it abundantly clear that you don't want to learn cmake but
provided very little data as to why. Have you looked at the code? Have you
tried it? (As a parent Green Eggs and Ham is coming to mind).
Richard
KF5OIM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
