Thanks Bertrik, I have checked in that patch. - David
On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 22:53 +0100, Bertrik Sikken wrote: > Hi, > > Attached are the results of a run of the static code analyzer > tool 'cppcheck'. In generally, I find it a good tool to find silly > little mistakes in code. It's not perfect of course, it may find > false positives and may let slip a few bugs through. > > The attached patch fixes the most obvious mistakes, an out-of-bounds > error in src/ampexp.c and an unitialised (and unused) variable in > src/quantise.c > > Most of the warnings from cppcheck probably need a more thorough look > with more knowledge of the code. > > Kinds regards, > Bertrik > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications > Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. > Read the Whitepaper. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ Freetel-codec2 mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Freetel-codec2 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
