>>>>> "RS" == Richard Shaw <[email protected]> writes: RS> Ok, I have some icons I created in the contrib directory. We should probably RS> apply one of the Creative Commons licenses to them, any preference on which RS> one?
A Free One. Perhaps the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Public License? https://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses#Creative_Commons_Attribution_Share-Alike_.28CC-BY-SA.29_v4.0 "Authors who use or are planning to use a Creative Commons license that includes the NonCommercial or NoDerivs license elements should understand that these restrictions are incompatible with Free Software." "Authors who use or are planning to use the Attribution 2.0 license should consider a similar Free Software license such as a BSD- or MIT-style license [BSD], [MIT]." "Authors who use or are planning to use the Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 license should consider a similar Free Software license such as the GNU General Public License [GPL]." -- http://evan.prodromou.name/ccsummary/ccsummary.html#recommendations-for-authors See also: http://opensource.org/docs/definition.php Since the rest of the application is already GNU LESSER GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 2.1 picking that would be really simple. Hope that helps, -Maitland ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data. Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems _______________________________________________ Freetel-codec2 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
