I dunno.... The way the alorgithm is written, I would think it is a better fit on a general purpose processor like the Cortex M4+FPU.
It's like not it is DSP specific doing a load of large FIRs and IIRs and adaptive equalisers at race-pace. I looked at how the algorithm would execute on the SHARC and I concluded there was nothing gained except complexity.... (granted that the SHARC only excels when you do your own assembly language (which is actually easy because it is plain english) because the compiler never uses the rich range of CISC instructions that is has). IMO, the sort of software that starts on a PC is often never a good fit for a real DSP. (without a rewrite from the top down) . On 13/03/2015 7:24 AM, Bruce Perens wrote: > On 03/12/2015 01:11 PM, Steve wrote: >> The other thing, to save memory is to ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ Freetel-codec2 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
