Hi Thomas
You are talking about hierarchical coding and transmission, and it has been discussed here widely.

We have considered it  and I think it is in the informal roadmap, IE when conditions are good, we have a low priority stream that enhances the user experience.

The frequency selective narrowband HF channel represents rather different character compared to the VHF narrowband channel which is primarily a flat fading condition.

Frequency diversity is the most efficient system wide method of solving the problem on HF

I suspect when the frequency selective performance is deemed OK by the users,  and that is the frequency selective channel properties generated by say, a >600km ionospheric path, then the users will begin to push the vertical incidence ability of FreeDV, this is a high random doppler profile and will likely spur another round of development to cope with it.

regards

glen english VK1XX


On 7/09/2015 2:01 AM, Tomas Härdin wrote:
Hi

(I tried sending this a few days ago but forgot to confirm my
subscription to this list - oops! So resending)

My name is Tomas and I've been following the development of codec2 on
and off for a few years now, and since getting my ham license earlier
this year I find myself thinking about it more. A few days ago I had
what I thought was a clever idea for fixing the "digital cliff" problem
Mike mentioned in a talk that's up on YouTube (I forget which). Today I
see on the roadmap post[1] that this is currently being worked on using
two GMSK streams, but I thought "hey, maybe someone will find it
interesting". So here goes:

The idea assumes that codec2 can make use of bitrate peeling. That is,
that we can split the stream up into two or more streams where the first
one provides a rough but usable quality, and subsequent streams improve
upon this. H.264's SVC would be an example from the video world

So the idea is take these streams and modulate them onto a hierarchical
QAM system. The simplest would be to take the current FDMDV modem and
instead of using 14x QPSK (aka 4-QAM) carriers you use 7x 16-QAM
carriers. You then code the more important bitstream into the most
significant bits in each 16-QAM symbol, and the improvement stream into
the lower bits (assuming the two streams have identical bitrate). Since
you now have half the number of carriers you can put twice the amount of
power into each carrier

That's about it. Lots of variants are of course possible, but this
should get the point across. I may experiment with the idea once I get
some suitable SSB equipment, but for now I'm interested in feedback even
if it's just shooting it down :)

/Tomas, SA2TMS

[1] http://www.rowetel.com/blog/?p=3931




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2

-- 
- 
Glen English
RF Communications and Electronics Engineer

CORTEX RF
&
Pacific Media Technologies Pty Ltd

ABN 40 075 532 008

PO Box 5231 Lyneham ACT 2602, Australia.
au mobile : +61 (0)418 975077 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2

Reply via email to