Hello David, well i think the samples sound much better then 700B, but still not as good as 1300, especially mmt1 sounds quite bad as if the new algorithm has a problem with the noise suppression? Also i wonder what a female voice sounds like, because ve9qrp_10s sounds a bit lowpassed.
greetz Simon PS: A way of bad Auto-Correction: :D "I would like to see if we can modify the model in always that [..]" Am 08.03.2016 um 02:42 schrieb David Rowe: > Hello Lists, > > I'm working on some new ideas for Codec 2. The aim is to get quality > similar to FreeDV 1600 (which uses Codec 2 at 1300 bit/s) at 700 bit/s. > > I have posted some samples here: > > http://www.rowetel.com/wordpress/?p=5015 > > (table of samples part way down the blog post). > > Would be interested to hear what you think of the newamp 700 and 1000 > samples, in particular compared to 700B. > > Cheers, > > David > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Transform Data into Opportunity. > Accelerate data analysis in your applications with > Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. > Click to learn more. > http://makebettercode.com/inteldaal-eval > _______________________________________________ > Freetel-codec2 mailing list > Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications with Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. Click to learn more. http://makebettercode.com/inteldaal-eval _______________________________________________ Freetel-codec2 mailing list Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
