On 07/12/17 21:39, Stuart Longland wrote:
> I don't think any of us can, legally, even if we *did* have a copy of
> the implementation.
> 
> I think someone who had a copy of the CODEC contributed those samples.
> They were not done by any of the core team.

In fact, this confirms it:
> I don’t have a AMBE or MELPe codec handy so I used the samples from the DVSI 
> and DSP Innovations web sites. I passed the original “DAMA” speech samples 
> found on these sites through Codec 2 (codec2-dev SVN revision 3053) at 
> various bit rates. Turns out the DAMA samples were the same for the AMBE and 
> MELPe samples which was handy.
→ http://www.rowetel.com/?p=5520

So it was taking the same uncompressed samples that DVSI/DSP Innovations
produced, and encoding those with Codec2.  So if you want the
implementation that produced those MELP samples, you'll have to talk to
DSP Innovations.

I wish you luck!
-- 
Stuart Longland (aka Redhatter, VK4MSL)

I haven't lost my mind...
  ...it's backed up on a tape somewhere.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2

Reply via email to