Hi Glen

Sorry for disagreeing!

You probably refer to ready assembled boards. The bottleneck are NOT the chips 
or their design. The problem are the cheap VTCXOs on PLUTO or LIMESDR. When 
applying an external low phase noise reference at 40 MHz the concept hits e.g. 
the praised IC9700. On 1.Ghz the RX and TX phase noise of the  a/m Lime was 
measured  far better (offsets at 100Hz up to 200 kHz).

With these advanced chips from Analog Devices or Lime microsystems cleaner 
microwave radios can be designed than any of these old analoge radios + noisy 
transverters.

Take care.

73, Helmut, DC6NY




-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: glen english [mailto:[email protected]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. April 2020 12:48
An: [email protected]
Betreff: [Freetel-codec2] A warning on using single chip transceiver chipsets.

While on this discussion, I think a caution neds to be applied here to the 
single chip radios about, IE transcievers used for DV hot spots, and SDRs like 
Lime SDR.

Their wideband phase noise is TERRIBLE. They polute the band . And many do not 
understand the implications and effects.  As well as wideband noise, they use 
fractional synthesisers and their spurs are many  and broad over a wide spectrum

These type of single chip transceivers are not designed for operating in a 
space where there are sensitive radio service in the same 20 MHz....
Well they are but the limit is an ERP of about 100mW before harmful 
interference is caused to, for example the local repeater.

Happy to discuss/ advise, suggest / comment.

So, from this POV, its pretty hard to do a low cost simple chipset that can be 
connected to a 25Watt amplifer and any sort of decent antenna. There are 
options, but they're not necessarily expensive  and they need to be carefully 
implemented.

cheers

glen VK1XX


On 4/2/2020 7:07 AM, David Rowe wrote:
> Hi Mooneer,
>
>> As for the SM2000, it might be useful to resurrect at some point. Or
>> perhaps include the lessons learned in a future project. :)
> There is a lot of scope for open source DV and VHF/UHF
> experimentation, as Jeroen and several others are showing us.
>
> The idea of a low MDS VHF/UHF stand alone radio embodying some of the
> concepts of the SM2000 is still intriguing to me:
>
> + efficient modems and low noise figure, so it runs DV in the <
> + -130dBm
> range (20dB better than FM and 1st gen DV)
> + LPCNet style wideband codec
> + something stand alone/portable/HT form factor minimal hardware
> + lockdown/high performance modem (avoid chipsets with
> the modem inside)
> + a few watts power output, proper PA filtering that meets commercial
> + specs
>
> But not sure what hardware I'd use these days.
>
> Cheers,
> David
>
>


_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2


--
Diese E-Mail wurde von AVG auf Viren geprüft.
http://www.avg.com



_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2

Reply via email to