> I would appreciate any feedback on this. The only real drawback that
I
> have found is that obviously the number of hits to the file system is
> increased, but given the amount of time it saves customizing applications,
we
> viewed that as acceptable.
I wonder if CVS wouldn't do this work for you. Imagine this scenario. I
grab
an anonymous copy from CVS. I open up ScreenInfo and add a new entry
to the array. Then I add a new screen module. OK, now I someone else
commits a change to the ScreenInfo array in CVS. If I run cvs update, CVS
will leave the modified files alone, I believe. But I think there's a way
around this. I'm about a third of the way through Karl Fogel's book on
CVS, so I may have an answer for this problem in the coming weeks.
It's sort of like each person who grabs FreeTrade needs their own branch.
But we can't possibly host every implementation of FreeTrade in our
repository.
Does anyone know if there's a way to keep your own repository and do a
merge with a remote one?
Leon
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Site: http://www.working-dogs.com/freetrade/
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
