On Thursday 25 August 2005 17:18, Turner, David wrote: > My opinion is that the DSIG table is the brain-child of DRM-obsessed > managers at Microsoft Typography (or above), who don't understand much > things regarding security.
Managers rarely understand these things ;-) > If digital signatures are not mandatory _and_ used with non-reversible > encryption, they're simply useless. As signed font can be thought of as the equivalent of a signed (but unencrypted) email message (its done using more-or-less the same system). -- David Somers VoIP: FWD 622885 PGP Key = 7E613D4E Fingerprint = 53A0 D84B 7F90 F227 2EAB 4FD7 6278 E2A8 7E61 3D4E
pgpVhmltUUAp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
