On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 11:53:01AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > How do you come to this conclusion? The original BDF specification > (found in the X11 distribution) says that both FONT_ASCENT and > FONT_DESCENT are *logical* values. They don't guarantee that all > bitmap glyphs are within this range. Sorry, I thought they are calculated (5005.BDF_Spec.pdf doesn't mention them). Still, then we should set y_scale to 8 / (face->ascender + face->descender) in, for example, Set_Pixel_Sizes in ttdriver.c, shouldn't we?
I found docs/CHANGES mentions this change and it says FT_Set_Pixel_Size is used to select actual font dimensions (the `strike'), not the nominal size. Maybe my question is what "actual font dimensions" mean? -- Regards, olv _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
