On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 05:58, david turner wrote: > Just keeping TT_RunIns reachable is not enough, we must also prevent > modifications of many > internal structures of the TrueType driver and interpreter that you're > relying on. Well, one point of rummaging in the source tree is to get access to the internals of the version on the current machine.
It's enough of a hack that to me it doesn't seem unreasonable to require people (who need that feature) to build on their own machine. All I want is that the entry point remain available in some shape or form. > > It'd be much better if you could find a way to embedded the FreeType > functionality within > the FontForge sources directly, instead on relying on something so fragile. We discussed this before. It would divorce ff from freetype fixes which to me is far worse. > > Please understand that we don't want to maintain _that_ level of > backwards compatibility. I feel this is something where >I< maintain the compatibility, not you. I just don't want a situation where I can't hack around things. I think we have different goals... you want to make production software, while I just want something that can be made to work... _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
