On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 01:05:03PM +0100, david turner wrote: > Hi Steve,
> thanks a lot for the patch, we'll look into it. I really hope to release > 2.2 this week ! Great, I'm really looking forward to being able to put 2.1.10 behind us. :) > Apart from that, note that the default .deb packages for libfreetype6 > enable the > bytecode interpreter by default, this may explain the difference in > rendering. Well, I've been doing all of my testing with local packages of 2.2rc4, based on the existing Debian packages; unless 2.2rc4 includes changes to how the bytecode interpreter is enabled, the patch used for previous versions ought to still be having the intended effect. You're welcome to have a look at these packages at <http://people.debian.org/~vorlon/freetype/>, to confirm whether it is a bytecode interpreter issue. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
