rperez a écrit :
Hi there,
I am using ImageMagick library to render text on an image. ImageMagick uses
FreeType to perform this action. I have a question about three actions in
terms of performance (are they "heavy actions"?).
1) FT_Attach_File - does it read from disk?
Yes
2) FT_Load_Glyph - does it read from disk?
Yes
3) FT_Init_FreeType - is it heavy (this is done in the ImageMagick library
for each rendering)?
Not heavy performance wise, but allocates memory.
The biggest performance issues will be with FT_New_Face and FT_Load_Glyph
Hope this helps,
- David Turner
- The FreeType Project (www.freetype.org)
Thanks in advance,
Ronen.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/performance-on-FreeType-actions-t1387531.html#a3727570
Sent from the Freetype - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
***********************************************************************************
Information contained in this email message is confidential and may be
privileged, and is intended only for use of the individual or entity named
above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please immediately notify the [EMAIL PROTECTED] and destroy the
original message.
***********************************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
