> The problem is in Pango actually. "Pango has no problem using it" as in > no one ever complained about, except recently in Fedora lists. The > complaint is that Pango is not LGPLed, because it uses code that is GPL > +FTL. > Ah sorry, I imagined that harfbuzz was going to be distributed as a separate library, not as an integral part of Pango.
In this new context, I understand that you would want a single license. I'm ok with re-licensing this code under the LGPL, but I believe that Werner wrote most of it, so you'd better ask him (and check the sources for author disclaimers). Regards, - David > Nothing serious. I thought I ask for a relicensing, but if that's not > possible, I'll just make it clear in Pango's license that it's not LGPL. > > > > Regards, > > > > - David > -- > behdad > http://behdad.org/ > > "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little > Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." > -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 > > > _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
