On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 23:56, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > I have no opinion here. If you think this is the route to go, let's > do this. However, I could imagine to have > > FT_Get_Chars_Of_Variant > FT_Get_Variants_Of_Char > FT_Get_Variant_Selectors I like this much better (I was just trying to be consistent with the old interface), but this is certainly easier to use. > > instead which return an array of all chars or variants, respectively. > Whether this makes sense, I don't know. Hmm. Your suggested > functions are probably better in the sense of memory consumption; my > suggestions can cause big allocations... I don't think it will be too bad. Currently only ~260 variant selectors are reserved and less than 10 are actually defined. The only questionable one is FT_Get_Chars_Of_Variant, but even here I don't think there will be any huge arrays -- my understanding is that even Adobe-Japan-1 has only 1222 characters with multiple variants.
_______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
