On Jan 9, 2008 12:56 PM, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Without a detailed look into the sources I think this is a correct > > > assumption. Do you expect something different? > > > > I was unsure, my tests with the various ft tools in the command > > lines show it NULL. I tried to be sure that it was always the case > > when the family name is not defined or something wrong happened. The > > docs did not explicitally say it :). > > To which section in the documentation are you referring to? Maybe it > should be improved. > > > I also took a look in other projects, there is a lot of projects out > > there using family_name without previous checks, maybe it is worth a > > little note in the doc? > > Patches are highly welcomed. > > > A last question, is there a better (cleaner) way to access this > > property? > > You simply check the fields of the FT_Face structure. Isn't that > simple enough?
It is simple enough. I thought there is a function to access it its member. I was also referring to the FT_Face documentation. A little note to say that this member can be NULL and should be tested before being used. Is the API docs generated from the comments in the source? I can send a patch if yes. > > The fix: > > http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/php-src/ext/gd/libgd/gdft.c?r1=1.45&r2=1.46 > > This looks good, however, `encoding' is just an enumeration, not a > pointer. Oh right, the encoding test is useless then. Thanks for your work! -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
