> With Freetype being GPL (x)or modified BSD licensed*, doesn't this
> mean that either:
>
> - under GPL license, the complete Freetype dependent software should
> be GPL
Yep.
> - under BSD license, none of the other software may be GPL?
I think so, yes.
> Does this mean that *if* Freetype is being used in iPhone, and the
> sources are kept closed, the BSD license must thus apply, and thus
> non of the dependent software may be GPL (due to the BSD/GPL
> license).
The `problem' is not the FreeType license but the GPL which prevents
use of closed sources.
Werner
_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
