Hi,

Thank you for the response.

FT_Load_Glyph() takes lot of time compared to FT_Get_Char_Index().
Please find the details below.

FT_Get_Char_Index()- It takes around 0.005 ms per character.
FT_Load_Glyph() - It takes around 2.9 ms per character.

Could you please provide your inputs for improvements?


Thanks and Regards,
Poornima.


-----Original Message-----
From: mpsuz...@hiroshima-u.ac.jp [mailto:mpsuz...@hiroshima-u.ac.jp] 
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 1:54 PM
To: Poornima
Cc: freetype-devel@nongnu.org; jeyasathy...@jasmin-infotech.com
Subject: Re: [ft-devel] Reg:True Type Font display

Hi,

On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:59:38 +0530
"Poornima" <poornim...@jasmin-infotech.com> wrote:
>We have ported Free Type Font Library (freetype-2.3.11) on fixed point DSP
>processor (BF533, 600 MHz) in VDSP Platform.
>
>Basic functionality is working fine. We have got output display in LCD
>monitor through HDMI connector.
>
>But the FT_Load_Char() function is taking lot of time to execute (around 3
>ms per character).
>
>Could you please provide your inputs for optimizing the function
>FT_Load_Char()?

I have no experience of the development for DSP,
so I have no idea about DSP-specific issue exists
/or not. How about the speed of FT_Get_Char_Index()
and FT_Load_Glyph()?

Regards,
mpsuzuki




_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel

Reply via email to