Hello all, On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Don't hurry. Both Graham and Bevan are busy people (and me too), >>> so it will take a while to get proper responses. However, I second >>> Graham's request for images which help a lot in the discussion. >> >> Attention: blind test. Check the quality of o's. >> The better image is vanilla 2.4.3. >> The worse image is the HEAD. > > I consider conic0.png the better image. However, the differences are > very subtle. >
I also consider conic0.png to be slightly better (I did the blind test *before* reading Werner's response). Regards, -- Leon _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
