In article <4cddb059.8080...@behdad.org>, Behdad Esfahbod <beh...@behdad.org> writes:
> > To parse OpenType tables at low level and > > obtain the substituted glyph index, libotf > > might be useful. > > > > http://www.m17n.org/libotf/ > Interesting. I had totally forgotten about libotf. I hope now that new > harfbuzz is in a usable state Kenichi abandons the libotf and helps with > harfbuzz. I too want to switch from libotf to harfbuzz, but at the moment, harfbuzz is not released as an independent library (and APIs are still changing), I can't catch a good timing to shift to harfbuzz. > > Maybe you're thinking of libm17n; that looks closer to harfbuzz in > > functionality. > That too. I really hope to use libm17n's shaping engine from harfbuzz. A few years ago, I asked you to include libm17n-based shaping module in Pango, but there have been no progress, perhaps because Pango is going to use harfbuzz's shaping engines, right? And, when I checked harfbuzz code a while ago, it seems that shaping engines are builtin (i.e. not by loadable modules). Don't you have a plan of making it possible that harfbuzz can use the other loadable shaping engine? --- Kenichi Handa ha...@m17n.org _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel