>> If I've understood James correctly, the new code is actually >> compiler dependent but the compilers he tested all produce the same >> result. > > To me the code looks like a welcome > microoptimization/simplification. The result should be the same > regardless of compiler.
Oh, so it's really me who is dumb :-) If James confirms your statement, I'm going to replace the code as he has suggested in his patch.. Werner _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel