> The 'stretched' x-height could be a matter of taste, but personally
> i would like to see the autohinter err on the side of less
> stretching if possible.
Hmm. I could add the ability to switch off x-size snapping, and I
could also change the rounding rules to something similar the SROUND
instruction offers. But IMHO the first option leaves a lot of fuzzy
x-heights for various ppem values, and the second option just shifts
the issue to different sizes. But maybe it makes it shift away from
the `important' sizes... I'll add it to my TODO list.
> A gui to visibly tweak the pixel snap zones ;)
Well, *that* I won't provide, I think :-) However, I'll think about
how to make this easily editable, for example, by providing a simple
bytecode function which accepts a list of sizes where x-size snapping
should be disabled. This list could be given as a command line
option. Also added to my TODO list :-)
Werner
_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
