Unless I've misunderstood, It seems to me that the changes being made are not to amalgamate FreeType into a couple of files, but just to rename some stuff/change some #defines to make this possible for another tool to optionally do.
If so, I really can't see what the problem is and why you're being offensive on the mailing list - it just makes FreeType usable in a different way for those who would like it, doesn't it? As for your earlier comment: "You will make people who borrow from FreeType miserable and make them curse at you for renaming stuff for no good reason whatsoever." I can't speak for anyone else, but FreeType has been a fantastic and much-appreciated library over the years for us and we have total respect for the people who have put so much time into creating it, so if a bunch of stuff gets renamed that makes it easier to use for others to benefit from then it's fine with us. On 21 Feb 2012, at 17:12, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote: > How about a shared header file if those modules share a structure? > Don't you see that this patch set is just a pile of pure stinking crap??? > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Vinnie <thev...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> Werner: >> >> 2012-02-20 Vinnie Falco <vinnie.fa...@gmail.com> >> >> >> ftgrays.c, ftraster.c: Undefine RAS_ARG* and RAS_VAR*, rename PRaster, >> TRaster >> > > _______________________________________________ > Freetype-devel mailing list > Freetype-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
