On 14-08-16 07:25 PM, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote: > On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Behdad Esfahbod <[email protected]> wrote: >> Scratch this part. the existing limit is more than enough for all practical >> purposes. It's pixel-size divided by upem in 16.16. So you need a font size >> 10000 pixels before you surpass a 1048576 scale. > > Graham, Behdad. > > Let me ask differently. What is the reason for the imbalance? > FT_MulDiv is symmetrical. Why is this not good for FT_MulFix.
FT_MulDiv is symmetrical because it takes two fixed numbers. FT_MulFix on the other hand takes an integer and a fixed, and usage has it that the integer comes as the first argument, and the fixed as the second. > Is there > empirical value for the imbalance (ratio)? Otherwise I'll just run > statistics.Whatever the imbalance though the patch is in order. -- behdad http://behdad.org/ _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
