Hmm, therefore, should we remove all constants using L suffix directly, and use such constants as the macros which is defined with appropriate suffix under the cpp-conditionals for 16-bit, 32-bit and 64-bit systems?
Regards, mpsuzuki Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote: > Hi All, > > I think we abuse the suffix L in integer constants. I understand the > desire to make sure that very common 0x10000L is 32-bit to represent a > unit in 16.16 fixed-point representation. On modern 64-bit systems > that actually becomes an unnecessary 64-bit constant. Perhaps the > suffix was used with 16-bit systems in mind, but 0x10000 cannot fit > into 16-bit integer and will always be 32-bit even on 16-bit systems. > > Am I missing something? > > Alexei > > _______________________________________________ > Freetype-devel mailing list > Freetype-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
