Hey, Here: https://github.com/behdad/color-emoji/tree/master/examples
Note that our sample fonts have version 2.0 as the table version number, where as the OpenType spec (which came after we shipped fonts) decided to use version 3.0. I suggest accepting both, possibly just warn about 2.0. b On 15-11-06 09:13 PM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > Hi Behdad, > > do you have such a font and/or can point me in the direction of > one such file? I'll add support for that to the TODO list of you-know-what > :-). > It doesn't currently parse those those tables, at all. I assume > that's because color glyphs is a recent (>2009) addition. > > Hin-Tak > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 14:13:54 -0400 > From: Behdad Esfahbod <beh...@behdad.org> > To: "freetype-devel@nongnu.org" > <freetype-devel@nongnu.org> > Subject: [ft-devel] Support standardized CBDT/CBLC > Message-ID: <561560e2.1020...@behdad.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > Werner, > > Apparently somewhere during the standardization, CBDT/CBLC > got their version > bumped to 3: > > https://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/cblc.htm > https://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/cbdt.htm > > FreeType currently only accepts 2, which is the number we > used in our > proposal. ttsbit.c needs to be updated to accept > 3. I suggest we accept both > 2 and 3 for both color and non-color versions of this. > Or you can only accept > 2 for non-color (EBDT/EBLC), and accept both 2 and 3 for > color ones. If doing > so, you want to disable color in EBDT/EBLC as well.. > > Whatever you do, please don't break our existing fonts, that > is, CBLC/CBDT > with version number 2. > > Thanks! > -- > behdad > http://behdad.org/ > > > -- behdad http://behdad.org/ _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
