On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> wrote:
> > > I am still not convinced that this is a good idea to deploy two > > versions in parallel. That LEAN suffix will stay long after > > Infinality is gone. > > Maybe there is a better macro name? > > How about #define TT_CONFIG_OPTION_SUBPIXEL_HINTING 40 meaning that if the value is set to 40 use new algorithm, otherwise use Infinality. > > Why can't you just replace Infinality? I doubt that Infinality > > itself was tested and maintained enough to be protected species. > > AFAIK, there is a huge user base, with a lot of variations on the used > parameters. FreeType is a mature library, and suddenly changing such > broadly used features is not user friendly IMHO. > > Additionally, having the two in parallel allows better comparison. > Well, if the new algorithm looks better, nobody will even notice. Does it look good?
_______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
