>> I don't have Japanese or Chinese text handy, but I want it on my finger tips
>> for Freetype testing. What is bad about hard coding it into Freetype ?
> I'm not suggesting to change ftview/ftstring to use gettext framework
> (because it would be too much), but having the binary executable and the
> collection of text files for testing would not be so difficult solution for
> the developers automating the tests. In my personal impression, for some
> languages, it would be difficult to define the best sample text, so it would
> be difficult for us to choose the best text which is worthful to hardwire
> into the binary executable.
ftstring -m can handle Unicode strings but I found it to be cumbersome as I
had to copy-paste sample strings from the browser. I can hard code Unicode
using c89 escaped strings byte by byte but it looks ugly, c99 \uhhhh escaped
Unicode looks more natural.
I only want to cover languages natively spoken by more than 100 mln people.
This is just 10 languages and strings.
Freetype-devel mailing list