Excuse me, what is the purpose of the sample texts in ftview/ftstring?
If it is to check the mapping (character code -> glyph index), the lack of Unicode text layout would not be essential. Also, if it is to check the per-glyph rasterization results (like the regression test in the improvement of the bytecode interpreter), again the lack of Unicode text layout would not be essential. Also, if it is to check the character coverage, again the lack of Unicode text layout would not be essential (and the pangram is not suitable for checking). In all 3 cases, in my personal opinion, using the pangrams as sample texts might not be the best solution. The first set of the characters in the Unicode block (skipping the combining characters) could be better. Werner, in the evaluation of the script-specific routines in the autohinter, Unicode layout feature is essential? Regards, mpsuzuki (2016/09/24 14:47), Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Ο καλύμνιος σφουγγαράς ψιθύρισε πως θα βουτήξει χωρίς να διστάζειMaybe you find something with polytonic Greek also? Werner _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
_______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
