I re-ran the new backend and by-pass the full validation. 3-week-old FreeType is not happy with 16 of the 22; vs 4 of 22 with the old 1.0 MS proprietary backend.
So 12 font files MS loads, 3-week-old FreeType does not. Werner made 3 changes in the last few days, which presumably will fix some of the 12... -------------------------------------------- On Wed, 28/12/16, Hin-Tak Leung <[email protected]> wrote: So yes, rather interestingly, the older FontVal 1.0 backend from Microsoft is happy to read 18 of the 23 (18 = 29 - 6 (CFF) - 4 - 1 [24.ttc]), which is a lot happy than FreeType's 4-9 of 23. the backend I was running is a heavily patched derivative of bcae657482ca038dc2b7c4ddd737a110c85e052a . Let's say it is a 3 weeks' old freetype. _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
