>> And what would a better API look like, separate functions for
>> separate options?
> 
> Yes, that's what I would do.  FreeType should not be a linker.  The
> linker should be the linker. :) But Werner likes it this way, so
> that's fine with me.

Indeed, I prefer to have few functions with a flexible interface.
This allows me to deprecate experimental functionality very easily.


    Werner

_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel

Reply via email to