On 17/05/2018 06:10, John Emmas wrote:
I seem to have several other libraries which use inline (i.e. the
non-underscored version) and they're all building correctly. So could
it be that freetype2 has re-defined it somehow? Or maybe it #includes
a file somewhere that re-defines the meaning of inline ??
Some extra information's come to light (from this MSDN article...)
" The *inline* keyword is available only in C++. The |__inline| and
|__forceinline| keywords are available in both C and C++ "
I think that explains it !!
Freetype-devel mailing list