>> All those scripts should run with plain `sh' ...
>
> Totally, sorry, I overlooked that! However, I would use `sh` to
> invoke the script to keep the setup independent of Debian. It might
> be more future-proof to use `chmod +x foo.sh; ./foo.sh` but I
> generally try to me rather explicit when writing code. Please let
> me know if you have any preferences there (`chmod ...` vs. `sh ...`)
> -- I'm happy to follow these guidelines :)
We are perhaps miscommunicating. The issue is not whether you call
the script directly with a shell or indirectly via the shebang (IMHO,
it doesn't matter). The issue is rather that `bash' supports a bunch
of extensions that other shells don't have. For this reason,
`configure.ac' shouldn't contain any bashisms. A bare-minimum POSIX
shell implementation like `dash' might catch them.
Werner
_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
