I'm sorry.
I think I fell into a fixed idea because of my good looking results.

Now, I'm trying to combine the advantages of both codes. I think I will reuse the idea of ​​a lot of existing code.

If you want to work on your own, please tell me so that I can save my time.

Thanks.


On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 22:51:33 -0400, Alexei Podtelezhnikov <[email protected]> 
wrote:
[3]
bauhaus_256px_3_gedit_all_patched.png:
The remaining patches were applied. You can see that all the artifacts are
removed. The middle stem of the "$" character is rendered to the right 
thickness.

I can also see that after all set and done the glyph is much less
emboldened. You could have just used less strength with the original
algorithm and achieved similar results. Again it is important to
achieve fewer artifacts with the *same* stem thickness.


_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel

Reply via email to