On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 9:08 AM Alexei Podtelezhnikov <apodt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 5:43 AM Alexei Podtelezhnikov > <apodt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Alexei, I think we miscommunicate. > > > > I struggle to get your attention to FT_Glyph_To_Bitmap. > > I just discovered that, while ignoring the FT_Glyph abstraction in the > current implementation, we also disregard FreeType caching system, see > FTC_ImageCache_Lookup. This is just lovely but please continue your > arguments against fire-walling FT_Render_Glyph from accessing FT_Face. > I don't understand what you mean; if you're being sarcastic or not. But FreeType caching system does not solve any problem for the systems I know. It's at best useful only for small clients for single-threaded use. -- behdad http://behdad.org/
_______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
