>> Looks good! Please submit a Pull Request that Armin (and others) >> can review. > > Done!
Thanks. > The fuzzer already found a bug in the renderer, I have attached a > patch (diff.txt) to fix this > (https://github.com/freetype/freetype2-testing/runs/3213214141). If > you require a merge request instead, then I'll make it tomorrow. I'm fine with a MR. Otherwise please make a local commit (with a proper GNU-style commit message), then say git format-patch HEAD^ and send me the resulting file. >> - Alternatively SDF could get it's very own fuzzer. We've already >> done this to separate rendering from utility access; we _could_ >> look into further separating fuzzing rendering from fuzzing SDF >> rendering. Although, that would be quite a lot of work. > > Seeing how slow the `sdf` renderer is I think the second option > would be better. I agree. > Dominik recently added the COLRv1 fuzzer, if the process is similar, > then I can work on adding a new fuzzer for SDF. Proper support for SDF is probably a bit more complicated since it also has to cover rendering (which the COLR stuff doesn't do IIRC). Werner
